ISSN: 1094-2726

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

Current Issue
Editor's Desk
Write for Pif

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -



-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

-    -     -    -    -    -     -     -

Pif Magazine
6115 NE 185th Street
Kenmore, WA 98028

ISSN: 1094-2726


PAST COMMENTARY MORE COMMENTARY

Everyone comes to the Freak Show
To laugh at the Freaks and the Geeks
Everyone comes to the Freak Show
But nobody laughs when they leave.
- The Residents, "Freak Show"


A better way of summing up my life I have not found. Me, a gargantuan intellectual, a punk snob, 'the largest arms in writing' with a 315 bench-press. Too cultured for some, too wild for others. 'Richard Weems: a nice place to visit,' etc. I have a way of scaring people off with my crazed, manic nature. I crave opera one moment, blood sport the other. Chaos and virtue. Sushi and McDonald's. Many people flock to me, but through pity or disappointment or fear they shrink away again. A walking Freak Show. In the end, far from an amusement and a little too intense to take very seriously.

I have right now an obsession with The Residents. I have tapes of their old collections Heaven? And Hell! that have only left my car stereo for each other. I make weekly treks, as regular as salmon migration, to the same circuit of used CD stores to look for more. A big-ass Oompah-Loompah rejected even from the Chocolate Factory. I don't order in advance – what I'm looking for must be there already, waiting, sitting, so that when I come across it I can make funny noises of joy and discovery in the aisle and cause people to look sidelong at me, if they aren't already.

Home alone, I sit on my balcony with a few ice brews and conduct the air to The Third Reich 'n' Roll and Whatever Happened to Vileness Fats? (my favorite album, something like a soundtrack to a gothic-cum-Bauhaus children's show). Their versions of "This is a Man's World" and "Jailhouse Rock" aren't simple parodies of James Brown or Elvis Presley. The songs are more assessments of our deification of these men of music, condemnatory and sympathetic both. More importantly, these songs are so wholly digested into The Residents' style of music that they become songs written by The Residents rather than songs written by someone else.

Great artists steal and make what they steal wholly their own. The Residents' music is proliferate with the ridiculous thumping of bubblegum rock, but the music is more than bubblegum rock, more than bubblegum parody. It has become music wholly unique to The Residents and inseparable from their sound. That fucker Vanilla Ice didn't have the cajones to admit he stole the riff from Queen's "Under Pressure" because there was no art to Vanilla Ice – just sampling. When we hear Queen's bassline, it is still Queen's bassline because it has nothing to do with the Vanilla Ice sound because there is no artistry there, no originality in the Vanilla Ice sound. Jasper Johns made the American flag a stolen object he invented for his art. Forget about it as the national symbol, except in Jasper Johns' America. Ethan Canin shows no art in the fact that he plagiarized Bret Lott, because Ethan's stories are pretty artless to start with. His characters strive to exhibit purity. They don't cheat on their wives. They stay married for decades. They are normal and average, something I have never felt sympathy for (envy, yes). It's not that the art of a story depends on us not believing what is said. Art is not barbed criticism in favor of an alternative agenda. Art depends on us getting a feel that there is more than what we're told. Ethan's characters are too righteously flat for us to engage with them and get a feel of their whole selves beyond their self-characterizing statements.

Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" is a commonly used example of unreliable narrator (the more he tells us he's crazy, the more we believe he's the opposite), but "The Raven" is a poem of higher art. We believe the fact that there is a raven in the poet's room calling out, "Nevermore," but there is more to this tale than what the poet can tell us. He tortures himself via this raven. He knows what the raven's singular response is going to be, and so he asks it questions that, when answered with a mocked "Nevermore," will hurt him most. The artist does not have us merely accept or distrust what we're told but creates a world deeper than its immediate clues. A world beyond. We find fault and fancy in this world created for us, and we come away with a knowledge of it we may not wholly understand ourselves but that we are cognizant of having experienced.

To create the world beyond the artist must cross a line: the line of love. Love of a subject requires an utter acceptance of its faults and strengths, its heights of intellect and its banal silliness. Love is hard to come by, especially if it is of the self. If you like everything about your subject matter, you have not learned to love it yet, for this is mere infatuation, but the other end is just as bad. How easy is it to admit that your sister-in-law, who makes your mom cry and gets you fantasizing about cruel and unusual punishment, is genuinely fun to play miniature golf with?

The Residents loved the silly pop songs of the ‘60s. That's why they medley them together in The Third Reich 'n' Roll and equate Dick Clark to Adolph Hitler. That is why, despite the dictatorial inference, we can still enjoy the hell out of these silly pop song covers and not know whether it is the cover or the song itself that is silly. Love of subject matter allows that subject matter to breathe its own life, despite what you may want it to do, and what is the ultimate goal of art but to have it subsist on its own without the artist hanging over the audience's shoulder explaining things? Raymond Carver was asked once why he wrote about such sad people. This question surprised him. "I love my characters," he responded. "I love them enough to let them mess up now and then, but in the end I think they're noble."

Actually, Carver never said these exact words. These words are taken from Samuel Beckett and John Cage and Eric Bogosian, any who have also expressed this sentiment. Art does not make fun of its subject matter, nor does it try to sell it to us. In the end, it is the respectable artist who releases control of his work and allows it its own breath.

Which does not mean that the artist takes a blasé attitude toward the work. In fact, release of control comes only through intense rigidity. Beckett was extremely bossy about how Godot had to be informed. He forbade the play to ever see the stage again in Holland when he found out that a performance there cast women in the roles of Didi and Gogo. The Residents were so influenced by N. Senada's "Theory of Obscurity" (that an artist's best work is made when the artist is obscure and has little concern of an audience) that they composed an album that was never to be released (titled, appropriately, Not Available — now available). The Residents maintain such a rigid interpretation of the Theory of Obscurity that they never appear without some kind of disguise (their most popular being the tux and tails with eyeballs for heads), and they never reveal any personal information about themselves. Their music is their only true communication with the world.

But such constriction and discipline ultimately free the artist from the art. Donald Ault said about his interpretations of William Blake that he needed to learn the criticism on William Blake to such an extent that he could then forget about it. If a rigid work ethic intended upon freeing the object of art sounds contradictory to you, welcome aboard! You've taken a good step. Confusion is always a good step. I quote the I Ching: "Before a brilliant person begins something great, they must look foolish to the crowd." Start by looking foolish to yourself – the crowd will soon follow.

Which brings me back to The Residents, with William Blake their heaviest influence. I have never seen Blake's name associated with the eyeballed ones, but the similarities are striking. Blake wrote poetry on such a level that twenty years ago no respectable academic program would have considered a study on him worthy of attention. And though The Residents may have a cult following and their eyeball disguise may be known quite universally, very few would consider them 'serious artists.' This is because Blake and The Residents work on a level of very high foolishness. Both have a wonderful gift for inventing beautiful, absurd names. The Residents deal with characters with names like Mortimer Snerd and towns like Vileness Fats, and they write songs with titles like "Whoopy Snorp" (an absolute classic). Wonderful-sounding, cartoonish names. Their music has a Tex Avery soundtrack feel to it, the notes discordant and circus-like. And their mastery of the sound in language is a wonder. Listen to these lines, a refrain in the mini-operatic "Walter Westinghouse":

Eat Exuding Oinks Upon
And Bleed Decrepit Broken Bones
At Caustic Spells of Hell.
Just sound that list of syllables out, aloud, over and over again, and make your voice resemble the witch-like character in Mister Rogers' Land of Make Believe. Absurd sounds linked together with a beauty all their own.

But Blake was the first cartoonist and artist worth his mettle. Characters like Urizen and Beulah and Eleth & Uveth (pre-Heckle & Jeckle) and an ultimate plane of the universe called Golgonooza. What Blake envisioned was a universe where the regimented physics of Newton simply didn't exist. Take Wile E. Coyote. When running off the side of a cliff, he did not always fall at first. Why? He did not know yet that he was supposed to fall. Newtonian science tells us that the phenomena of him running off a cliff dictates that he should fall, regardless of whether or not he is cognizant of that phenomena.

But in the moment he is running, Wile E. believes he is running forward on solid ground, so the laws of falling do not yet apply. It is only through his own discovery of his predicament, or through a helpful sign from that smug bastard Roadrunner, that he realizes he should be falling. Then, of course, he falls and lands in his characteristic puff of impacted dust.

Blake's ideal universe works something like this. The rules apply only in the moment they need (or are desired) to be applied. It does not matter if the rules have applied in every moment before the moment they don't – the present moment, not the history, of the phenomena determines its rules. Newton's universe of predictable phenomena was a fallen universe in Blake's eyes. In Golgonooza, the laws applied to the creative mind, not the scientific one.

Think about how this applies to art in general. In a book, in a theatre, in a gallery, on the street, in our minds, all that matters in a work of art is the moment we are looking at it. The history of this art, or this artist, is irrelevant in the end. Everything revolves around the moment we are now experiencing it, if a proper love for it is conveyed, if we allow ourselves to like it and find fault with it and recognize it as something beyond our petty judgment of it.

Blake created a philosophy of art we are still trying to catch up to; The Residents are just one good example of some people who have made a damn fine trek along Wizard William's yellow brick road. Art is absurd, often silly, but never frivolous or lackadaisical. The artist creates to let go, but only through strict discipline and application of aesthetic. The ultimate goal is to adhere to this aesthetic so severely that it will disappear from the work of art altogether, its history irrelevant to its present moment. Sometimes I have no fucking clue what I'm reading in Blake, and if you ask me what I like about some Residents songs, I'll just shrug and laugh, and I am happy for this. Let them create, I think to myself. "You go, guys. You go." I am affirmed.

Tell us what you think. Email talkback@pifmagazine.com


Richard K. Weems currently has stories appearing in Gulf Stream Magazine and The Mississippi Review. He will be teaching fiction at the next Poetry & Prose Getaway in Cape May, NJ, in January. He also has a new tattoo. Sometimes, late at night, he throat sings.