Pif Magazine - ISSN: 1094-2726
Login to get the most from Pif' services.
  Jul 04, 2008 Writers Only ClassifiedsWrite for PifWant to Advertise on Pif?Meet the StaffContact Us TodayShop for Books onlineVisit our Archives  





Practicing for Heaven 
Poetry by Julia B. Levine 

reviewed by Rachel Barenblat
  


In her essay "The Fisherwoman's Daughter," – a foundational, though I hesitate to call it seminal, work – Ursula K. LeGuin puts forth a set of related theories about women's ways of writing. LeGuin points out that the archetype of the female artist is that of an unnatural woman who has chosen to be barren because conventional wisdom holds that one can't sustain both children and writing without one or both suffering as a result. She cites Alicia Ostriker:

That women should have babies rather than books is the considered opinion of Western civilization. That women should have books rather than babies is a variation on that theme.

LeGuin's response is simple: Nonsense. Women can, should, and must write from their own experience. While this does not necessarily include child rearing, nor does it exclude it. She writes:

White writing, [Helene] Cixous calls it, writing in milk, in mother's milk. I like that image, because even among feminists, the woman writer has been more often considered in her sexuality as a lover than in her sexuality as pregnant-bearing-nursing-childcaring. Mother still tends to get disappeared.

LeGuin cites Ostriker again:

The advantage of motherhood for a woman artist is that it puts her in immediate and inescapable contact with the sources of life, death, beauty, growth, corruption….If the woman artist has been trained to believe that the activities of motherhood are trivial, tangential to the main issues of life, irrelevant to the great themes of literature, she should untrain herself.

Julia B. Levine's Practicing for Heaven could have been written with the explicit desire to follow Ostriker and LeGuin's exhortations. These are poems written out of a woman's lived emotional experience. There is distance here, but it is the distance imposed by the great ineffables – death and sorrow chief among them – and not the distance of the (masculine) hero-artist withdrawing from the world.

"Walking Beside the American River," the book's first poem, presents the reader with a poignant combination of lush pastoral description ("Water spreads a flat pewter between cottonwoods") and reference to extreme personal loss ("I remember the doctor touching my arm,/ as if the bad news needed a place to enter"). The loss at the core of the poem is the almost-death of the narrator's husband.

…I saw then
death was a tearing apart
from all that did not stop, and nothing,
not even the lilies in a red glass
trembling as the nurses came and went,
or the stubborn grace of our children
hurling themselves over the hospital lawn,
could seal that sudden looming
between this world
and where you had almost gone.

The poem is addressed to the "you" who "had almost gone." As a result, the reader identifies with the husband, landing in the absence at the poem's center.

This opening poem is a microcosm of the book. Husband and children are major players, as is the beautiful but indifferent natural world. The children possess a "stubborn grace," as if they maintained their relationship with innocence or the sacred by an act of sheer obstinacy. In contrast, the adult world is pierced; bad news does need a place to enter, and the narrator is sufficiently broken that the bad news finds its way inside. (Perhaps this is Levine's PhD in Clinical Psychology showing through; her use of rupture calls Lacan to mind.)

Some of my favorite poems in the collection evoke the language of children's literature. "The horse knows the sky is bitter with ash," begins the poem "Fire," reminding one of the sentient animal narrators of folk tales or the ashes of the original Cinderella. Then the poem takes a startling turn:

But horses know nothing of regret,
of the vast distance between this fire
burning down the hills and my brother
jumping the creek with me to crouch in thistles…

Again, Levine speaks of loss. This time, instead of the loss that death (or near-death) presents, it's the loss imposed by distance in place and time. We don't know when or where exactly the narrator jumped a creek with her brother to crouch in thistles, but it's clear that the image carries with it regret, and that, as with all memories, the moment can't be recaptured.

In one hand, my father holds a glass of water.
He is drawing the other hand
across a map of the Russian Pale
into the complicated geography of exile.
He wants the boy to understand prayer
as water filling any shape that is offered,
and that fire, though it begins with so little,
must finally ask for everything.

Levine knows that exile, too, is a form of loss.













© 1995 - 2008 Pif Magazine · All Rights Reserved · Copyright Notice and Terms of Use
 

Designed and developed by DiMax, Inc.